Winklevoss twins want more money from Zuckerberg

January 11, 2011 7:13:47 PM PST
Only Hollywood knows if there will be a sequel to the movie "The Social Network," but in San Francisco Tuesday, the drama continued off-screen in Courtroom 3 of the U.S 9th District Court of Appeals.

The Winklevoss twins (Cameron and Tyler), both dressed in dark blue suits, sat in the front row of the public gallery as their attorney cited case law and legal precepts before a three-judge panel as to why a lower court decision should be overturned -- a decision in which they failed to get a multi-million dollar settlement with Facebook invalidated.

The Winklevosses were upperclassmen at Harvard University when they hired a young Mark Zuckerberg to write the code to create a social network. They alleged that he stole their idea to create Facebook. The twins later negotiated a $65 million stock and cash settlement. However, they are trying to invalidate the deal on the basis that Facebook did not disclose material information, specifically the value of its privately held shares. According to statements made in court, the twins wanted shares representing 0.30 percent of the company's stock. They received just over 1.2 million shares, which represented 45 percent of the $65 million settlement. The rest was in cash.

Their attorney, Jerome Falk of San Francisco, argued that Facebook withheld lower evaluations of the company's private stock worth. Had those numbers been known and used in the settlement, the twins would have received more shares of stock. Given the high-flying nature of Facebook and recent investments by outside investors, a settlement with more shares would make the Winklevosses even richer as the shares rise in value.

"The fact is that they chose to resolve their mediation probably late in the evening and go home before they addressed important commercial terms that have to be in there and they aren't in there," Winklevoss attorney Jerome Falk, Jr. said.

Facebook's attorney, Joshua Rosenkranz of New York, said that the company was under no obligation to volunteer information and that it was the responsibility of the twins' legal team to ask the right questions.

"They expected their adversaries to know what was on their minds and then to spoon feed them information that their assumption was wrong; now if we accept their version of what occurred, they are not victims of fraud, they are outright imbeciles," Joshua Rosenkranz said.

The three judge panel is not under any deadline when to issue its opinion in this case. The longer it takes, the greater the likelihood the value of Facebook shares will grow, yielding more money for the Winklevosses if they prevail.

After the hearing, the twins tried to stonewall reporters, but ABC7 managed to get them to stop and talk briefly.

"It's in the hands of the court and we look forward to the decision," Tyler Winklevoss said.


Load Comments