The New York Times picked up samples of tuna from 3 different Subway locations in Los Angeles and got them tested at a lab.
The test revealed that "no amplifiable tuna DNA was present in the sample."
The lab says the tuna was either so heavily processed that the tuna DNA wasn't identifiable or that no tuna was used.
Subway says it uses the skipjack and yellowfin tuna and that there's "simply no truth to the allegations."
RELATED | Subway tuna sandwiches contain no fish, California lawsuit claims