The key questions the court was asked to resolve: Can the utility be held liable for damages, and if they can be held liable, can the PG&E raise their rates in order to pay for those damages.
[Ads /]
RELATED: North Bay residents struggle to figure out housing plans after devastating fires
North Bay residents struggle to figure out housing plans after devastating fires
The October 8 fires are known as the most destructive in California history, burning more than 245,000 acres, destroying more than 5,000 homes and killing 44 people.
State Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones announced in October that claims from losses amounted to more than $3.3 billion.
While final investigations on the causes have not been completed, preliminary information appears to indicate that in many cases the fires were sparked by PG&E's equipment.
[Ads /]
The California Constitution states property owners can hold utilities responsible for damages because they are a public utility and subject to the legal concept of "inverse condemnation." That basically means, if a public organization is responsible for damaging private property the owners of that property can be compensated.
RELATED: PG&E unveils new wildfire safety operations center in wake of deadly North Bay fires
PG&E unveils new wildfire prevention center after deadly North Bay fires
PG&E argued that they are a private company and therefore they cannot be held under the same rules as a public company. "We continue to believe that inverse condemnation, as applied to a privately owned utility, is a flawed legal doctrine that is bad for all Californians," PG&E spokesperson Paul Doherty wrote to ABC7 news. "The loss of life, homes and businesses in these extraordinary wildfires is simply heartbreaking, and we remain focused on helping the North Bay communities recover and rebuild."
On Friday, PG&E denied being liable for the wildfires, but said if they were found liable they want to be able to ask for rate hikes from their customers to pay for the damages.
[Ads /]
Attorneys for the fire victims, believe PG&E should not be able to pass the buck for their mistake onto customers and should pay for it out of their pocket.
They pointed to two previous rulings in California that used "inverse condemnation" to prove that utilities were liable for damages.
The hearing ended with both sides agreeing with presiding judge Curtis Karnow to convene for an informal closed-door conference in early June.
Dion Lim will have a full report on ABC7 News at 4:00 p.m. and 6 p.m. And you can follow her on Twitter to get the latest on this story.
Click here for more stories, photos, and video on the North Bay fires.