With millions now working from home, some companies are considering digital surveillance tools to make sure their employees are actually working.
[Ads /]
To some degree, plenty of people are already being monitored by devices.
RELATED: How to stay cybersafe when working from home amid coronavirus pandemic
If you're an iPhone user, Screen Time shows when you're most active and which apps you use most frequently.
Depending on which communication platform your company uses, applications like Slack alert your colleagues about whether you're active or away.
"In a way, that's a form of surveillance right there," Ian Sherr, Editor at Large at CNET News told ABC7 News. "And I think the question is how far are we all willing to go?"
Sherr pointed to statistics, showing that across the country, productivity is up now that people are working from home.
"There's still some employers who honestly just don't get it yet, and are thinking about installing apps that would basically surveil their employees," Sherr added.
It's called digital surveillance, and the demand for monitoring software has gone up.
"Since this thing started, the coronavirus pandemic, 16-percent of companies ordered this kind of software because they'd like to monitor their employees," Cyber Security expert and professor at SJSU, Ahmed Banafa said. "Companies on the other side, who provide these kind of services, they saw 40-percent increase from their current customers asking for more licenses."
RELATED: Zoom fails to inform users of possible data sharing with Facebook, tech expert says
[Ads /]
More licenses to monitor more employees. While companies feel digital surveillance will help increase productivity, some argue whether it really invades privacy.
"There hasn't been a ton of testing around this stuff. This is all very new in terms of legal ground and what not," Sherr said. "But, I think one of the interesting things will be the question of whether or not employers should even take the step."
Sherr said it's not beyond reason that employers could make that move.
However, he explained, "I think that as the employment world gets a little better, as the unemployment rate dips down again- whenever that starts to happen- employees will have more power in negotiations."
"I have a feeling that if mass surveillance really does happen, and that's an 'if,' employees are going to push back," Sherr said.
Experts said these new tools require trust and transparency. Specifically, communication about what activity is being recorded.
Is your boss keeping track of your keystrokes? Will cameras or microphones be turned on? Will messages be read?
RELATED: Cybercriminals profit off COVID-19 fears; here are ways to secure your information and connection
"That type of surveillance kind of breaks the agreement that I'm doing my work, and you're getting results," Sherr said. "And in some way it doesn't matter, as long as I'm doing my work well."
[Ads /]
"The employer has a responsibility of telling employees, 'This is the software we are using for monitoring, and this is what we're going to monitor,'" Banafa said. "Because transparency and knowledge will make it much easier for me to accept it."
Workplace surveillance isn't new, but trying to navigate the process during this pandemic, definitely is.
"The clear winner in this fight with the pandemic is technology, because we have seen so much advancement in technology and so much transformation to digital technology," Banafa said. "And many companies, they never thought about it. They thought, this is going to be five years from now."
"It just smashed all the barriers and said, 'You have to be digital,'" he continued. "And this is one of the byproducts of this- okay, I'm digital. You stay home. I want to watch what you're doing."
Sherr said it's important that people are having these conversations, and subsequently, questioning boundaries.
"What are we comfortable with? Where do we want to draw those lines," Sherr asked. "That is going to mold the conversation going forward. It's a lot better honestly, than seeing a bunch of employers go off and do something, and we have to try to pull them back."
ABC7 News presented viewers with a Twitter poll asking viewers whether they'd welcome the approach. For reaction and response, click here.
If you have a question or comment about the coronavirus pandemic, submit yours via the form below or here.
- COVID-19 Help: Comprehensive list of resources, information
- INTERACTIVE TIMELINE: How close was CA to becoming a NY-level crisis?
- Live updates about coronavirus outbreak in US, around the world
- What will it take to get a COVID-19 vaccine and how will it be made?
- How California's COVID-19 cases stack up against other hot spot states
- Everything you need to know about the Bay Area's shelter-in-place order
- Coronavirus Timeline: Tracking major moments of COVID-19 pandemic in San Francisco Bay Area/
- List: Where can I get tested for COVID-19 in the Bay Area?
- COVID-19Diaries: Personal stories of Bay Area residents during novel coronavirus pandemic
- Coronavirus Doctor's Note: Dr. Alok Patel gives his insight into COVID-19 pandemic
- What does COVID-19 do to your body and why does it spread so easily?
- Stimulus calculator: How much money should you expect from coronavirus relief bill
- WATCH: 'Race & Coronavirus: A Bay Area Conversation' virtual town hall about COVID-19 impact on Asian American community
- WATCH: 'Race & Coronavirus: A Bay Area Conversation' virtual town hall about COVID-19 impact on African American community
- What Bay Area tenants need to know about rent payments, eviction amid COVID-19 outbreak
- Here's how shelter in place, stay at home orders can slow spread of COVID-19
- Symptoms, prevention, and how to prepare for a COVID-19 outbreak in the US
- List of stores, companies closing due to coronavirus pandemic
- Canceled late fees, free services available amid COVID-19 crisis
- Here's how you can help during COVID-19 pandemic
- How to maintain learning during school closures
- No masks but here are 100+ products that may help protect you against novel coronavirus germs
- Here's a look at some of history's worst pandemics that have killed millions